|
<
Accueil
< English
Menu
-

Présentation
Types d'expérience
Législation
Des chiffres
International
Chiens & Chats
Primates
Rongeurs
Autres

Information
Investigation
Laboratoires
Élevages
Transports
Sauvetages
Cosmétiques
> Produits chimiques
Biotechnologie
Méthodes
substitutives
Éthique
|
-
France attempts to block an EU ban
on cosmetics tests on animals
and on the sale of animal-tested cosmetic products.
Print
-
In a move to block a ban on animal
testing for cosmetics, France has instigated a legal action against
the European Parliament and the European Council. France is supporting
its action with the claim that article 1 point 2 of Directive 2003/15/CE
is too imprecise. Rather than asking for this point to be revised,
France has asked that it be annulled, which would empty the Directive
of all substance.
The reasoning behind France's position was made clear by the minister
delegate for foreign trade, Mr François Loos, in March 2003.
He described the European Parliament's decision as "stupid",
claiming that the new Directive would harm competition. France was
considering filing a complaint with the World Trade Organisation.
One Voice points out that this action goes against French public
opinion, with 64% of the population opposed to animal experimentation,
60% in favour of a ban on cosmetic testing on animals, and 84% agreeing
that all animal experimentation should be banned when it causes
the animal to suffer (IPSOS/One Voice poll – February 2003
– Representative sample of 1,000 people).
While the French clearly express their opposition to animal experimentation
and the suffering it causes, the French government quotes the need
to inform public opinion of the utility of such tests.
In the case of cosmetics, the sole justification is that of unhindered
competition. It would seem that France considers the market economy
to be more important than the 35,000-plus animals that suffer and
die each year in European laboratories.
One Voice believes that with profits of €5.9 billion in 2002,
the French cosmetics industry is well able to finance and carry
out, with government support, research into in vitro tests, thereby
enabling it to respect the Directive's 2009 deadline and to satisfy
consumers' demands.
Muriel Arnal, Chairwoman of One Voice, said that, "We have
struggled for 13 years to obtain legislation that will make it illegal
for animals to suffer in laboratories for such non-essential products
as perfume and lipstick. Now we face another wait of at least six
years for this legislation to be introduced. The cosmetics firms
that continue to torture animals have ample time to adapt their
methods and adopt ethics that reflect French and European public
opinion. We are appalled by the French government's action."
Press Release - August 2003
Translation
: Sandra Petch
|
-

-
Représentant français de Europe for Animal Rights et de la Coalition Européenne
pour mettre fin à l'Expérimentation Animale
- |
|
|
-
One Voice
23, rue du Chanoine Poupard
BP 91923 - 44319 Nantes cedex 3
Tél : 02 518. 318. 10
Fax : 02 518. 318. 18
|
-
-
- Toute
Reproduction des textes ou des photos est interdite sans autorisation
©
One Voice
|